Connect with us

Breaking News

Firm challenges court ruling on over N1b Customs duty

Published

on

Orlean Invest Africa Limited has formally appealed the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja that ordered the seizure and forfeiture of a Bombardier BD-700 Global 6000 aircraft, based on the the acceptance of the Customs Duty Assessment of over N1 billion , saying the trial court presumed the figure to be correct without any evidential foundation.

The company insists that the decision was reached without evidence and amounts to a serious miscarriage of justice.

The firm argues that the interim order was granted on the basis of bare and unsubstantiated claims by the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), and that the order was obtained through misrepresentation or concealment of material facts.

The company maintains that compelling legal and factual reasons to discharge the order were placed before the court but were wrongly ignored

The company has filed for a stay of execution of the Federal High Court judgment.

The notice of appeal, it was learnt, was filed on 23 January 2026 by the company’s lead counsel, Mr. Ama Etuwewe (SAN), a day after the Federal High Court delivered its ruling.

The appeal, now before the Court of Appeal, sets out seven grounds challenging both the factual findings and legal conclusions of the trial court.

At the heart of Orlean Invest Africa’s appeal is the argument that the Federal High Court wrongly concluded that the aircraft was imported into Nigeria by the company and remained in the country without payment of customs duties.

The appellants maintain that there was no evidence whatsoever before the court to support such a finding. They contend that the aircraft does not belong to Orlean Invest Africa Limited and that no proof was presented to establish ownership or importation by the company.

According to the appeal, the aircraft was flown into Nigeria strictly on a charter basis as a visiting aircraft and never remained permanently in the country.

The company further argues that the aircraft has at all times been registered on the Malta Aircraft Registry and was never transferred to Nigerian registration. It insists that unchallenged evidence before the trial court showed that the aircraft last entered Nigeria in 2018, contradicting the court’s conclusion that it was imported and remained in Nigeria.

Orlean Invest Africa says the judge substituted speculation for proof and delivered a decision unsupported by the record.

The appellants also challenge the order of final forfeiture, arguing that there was no evidence before the Federal High Court to justify condemning the aircraft to the Federal Government. They insist that the trial judge wrongly held them liable for customs duty on an aircraft they neither own nor imported, and that no law or evidence supports such liability.

A further ground of appeal contests the refusal of the trial court to set aside the ex-parte order of seizure and detention made in June 2025.

Orlean Invest Africa argues that the interim order was granted on the basis of bare and unsubstantiated claims by the Nigeria Customs Service, and that the order was obtained through misrepresentation or concealment of material facts. The company maintains that compelling legal and factual reasons to discharge the order were placed before the court but were wrongly ignored.

The appeal also challenges the acceptance of the customs duty assessment of over one billion naira, saying the trial court presumed the figure to be correct without any evidential foundation. In addition, Orlean Invest Africa contends that the trial judge wrongly held that the Nigeria Customs Service proved its case, despite what it describes as a complete absence of supporting evidence.

The company states that the entire judgement is against the weight of evidence presented during proceedings at the Federal High Court.

The firm is therefore seeking an order of the Court of Appeal allowing the appeal, setting aside the Federal High Court’s judgement delivered on 22 January 2026, and dismissing in full the Nigeria Customs Service’s application for forfeiture and condemnation of the aircraft.

Continue Reading

Breaking News

BREAKING NEWS: Nigerian Law Makers Demands CAC Registrar’s Sacking

Published

on

The Senate has asked President Bola Tinubu to remove the Registrar General of the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Hussaini Ishaq Magaji, SAN, from his office.

The Senate Committee on Finance, while passing a resolution in Abuja on Thursday, accused Magaji of failing to honor the Senate’s invitations to account for the finances of his agency.

“He refused on so many occasions to honour our invitation to appear before this committee.

“We have issues with the reconciliation of the revenue of CAC.

“Each time we invite him, he gives us excuses,” the Chairman of the committee, Senator Sani Musa, said as the committee passed the resolution.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘You didn’t speak when El-Rufai dealt with Kaduna – Coalition slams Atiku

Published

on

A Civil Society Coalition, Kaduna Voices United, has spoken out against some recent words from former Vice President Atiku Abubakar on the arrest, detention and prosecution of former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai.

They said his comments about the arrest and investigation of El-Rufai show that he is being unfair and not holding people to the same standards when it comes to being responsible and managing government properly.

In a statement by its Chairman, Yariok Makama Goje, the group mentioned that while worries about El-Rufai’s health and well-being are real, the public should not ignore the serious legal problems the former governor is dealing with.

The Coalition responded to comments attributed to Atiku, who reportedly said the Federal Government should be held accountable if something bad happens to El-Rufai, especially after reports that he had a nosebleed while in detention.

The former Vice President said the situation was “deeply troubling and unacceptable in a democracy,” and asked for transparency about which agency was responsible for detaining the former governor.

The coalition raised questions about the lack of similar demands for accountability during El-Rufai’s time as governor from 2015 to 2023, when there were often reports of financial problems and threatening critics.

Goje said, “The silence from important people, like Atiku Abubakar, during those difficult times makes us worry a lot about whether they are still honest in their current roles,” they said.

“The case of Nasir El-Rufai shows what can happen when someone in a position of power is accused of wrongdoing while in office. It is not only foolish but also risky to think about trying to clear El-Rufai’s name when he is dealing with major legal problems, like serious criminal cases brought by the Department of State Services, DSS, and probes by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, ICPC.

“The charges against him involve illegal wiretapping, not reporting intercepted messages, and endangering national security.”

The coalition also noted that anti-corruption agencies are still looking into claims of corruption and financial wrongdoings during El-Rufai’s time in office, including accusations that public money meant for big infrastructure projects was misused.

It said that these claims need careful legal review instead of political efforts to get quick approval or justice.

Along with the DSS charges, El-Rufai is also being looked into by the EFCC and ICPC because of claims of corruption and improper financial actions while he was governor from 2015 to 2023.

The EFCC is focusing on the claim that N432 billion was wrongly taken and that money laundering is connected to several projects, like the Kaduna light rail project, showing how serious the accusations against him are.

“Using public money for wrong purposes, especially in a country where there isn’t much money and public services don’t get enough support, is a big break of the trust people have in those in charge. The ICPC’s probe into claims of misuse of position and procurement violations adds to how serious the situation is,” the group said.

“These claims show that someone is using their position for their own benefit in a planned way, which hurts the trust people have in the role and makes them lose faith in how the government works. In a democracy, it’s important to hold public officials responsible.

“They should follow the best behavior and act in the best interest of the people, not just themselves. It’s important to understand that the legal problems El-Rufai is facing aren’t just personal matters; they also show bigger issues about how government works, whether leaders are held responsible, and how the law is followed in Nigeria.

“Trying to prove he is innocent despite serious accusations goes against the basic ideas of fairness and responsibility that are essential for a democracy to work properly. Public officials should be responsible for what they do, especially if their actions could endanger the country’s safety or involve using public money in the wrong way.

“The legal actions started by the DSS, EFCC, and ICPC are not only about punishing people who do wrong; they are also about making sure public officials don’t misuse their power and that the law is followed properly.

“The idea of trying to prove that Nasir El-Rufai is innocent despite the serious legal issues he is going through is not only not possible but also goes against the principles of fairness and responsibility.

“The seriousness of the accusations against him requires a detailed look into the situation, and if needed, the right legal actions should be taken.

“It’s concerning to see so much worry about El-Rufai’s well-being now, especially since many of us have been asking for accountability for his actions while he was in charge.

“The lack of attention to ethical standards during his time as governor, which involved claims of corruption and misuse of power, is now being overlooked because people are showing too much pity, even though he is now facing the results of what he did before.

“This big difference is not just dishonest, but it shows a bigger problem of people getting away with bad behavior that has been around in our politics for a long time.

“Atiku’s comments show a concerning lack of consistency and a level of embarrassment that needs to be looked into. It’s wrong to ask for accountability for how El-Rufai was treated without speaking up about the same problems that are now causing him trouble.

“The idea that people’s health and well-being should come first, even if public officials misuse their power for their own benefit, sets a harmful example.

“This means that having political connections can protect people from facing the consequences of what they did, which goes against the idea that everyone should be treated fairly and justly according to the law.

“It’s important to agree that asking for transparency when someone is being held is a good idea; but it shouldn’t only be used in certain situations. The same strong push from Atiku for clear answers about El-Rufai’s detention should also apply to everyone else who is accused of corruption or wrongdoing.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Naijacoaded | All Right Reserved | Powered by Naijacoaded.com |